I am an atheist from a Christian family. Quite a few of my Facebook friends are people I knew from church back in the day, and most of them are still Christians if not necessarily still at that church. So quite often I get religious memes across my feed, and there will sometimes be religious conversation around the dinner-table when I visit my family. It seems to me that I exercise quite a noble degree of restraint on these occasions, continually refraining from passing critical comment, saying nothing in front of the children. But of course everybody feels that they respond better to annoyances than they really do, and that they themselves are less annoying than they really are.
This isnt going to be about why I dont believe in God. Nor is it going to be anywhere near all my thoughts on religion. I just want to stake out my position on the question: to what degree should religion be tolerated, and to what degree should it be opposed? Is it like race or gender, so that opposition to a belief different from ones own is bigotry? Is it like politics, so that the rights and wrongs depend partly on what you want and what you stand for? Or is it like science, so that there is a truth of the matter and other positions are factually false? And can everyone please at least pick one of those and stick with it, rather than being like My religion is like my race and youre a bigot if you dispute it, but other peoples religions are like their politics and I hereby declare my opposition to them because I dont want them to be true?
Ive been drafting this post on and off for a while now. I started it when Libby Anne over at Love, Joy, Feminism wrote this post on the four major goals of the atheist movement, of which she endorses three, the exception being working toward a world without religion. I agree with most of what she says, but somehow the whole thing doesnt quite sit comfortably in my head. (By contrast I agree completely with what she said recently about Sam Harris, though admittedly because its just what I already thought.) Of all things, whats drawn me back to it is that, in the small choir I sing in, were now practising a setting of Thomas Hardys 1915 poem The Oxen for the upcoming Christmas concert. But Ill get to that.
My name is Daniel Copeland. Immanuel Kant was a real... I like quirky humour, Im incurably philosophical, and I hail from the Antipodes (New Zealand rather than Australia, but still). For my living, I take notes in lectures at the University of Otago on behalf of students with disabilities.
Showing posts with label creationism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creationism. Show all posts
Sunday, 23 November 2014
Sunday, 2 December 2012
Dear creationist
First of all, please note carefully that I am addressing you in the singular, Bodie Hodge, in answer to your Dear atheists... open letter over at Answers in Genesis. I am not assuming that all creationists are the same. I was one for four or five years, after all. Admittedly I was a teenager at the time and I think I was mostly doing it as a theologically-approvable gesture of independence from my theistic-evolutionist parents. Still, creationism got me into the habit of questioning what I read, without which I would not be an atheist today. Though, come to think about it, youre not likely to find that a positive thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)