Ive written on this subject before, but that was a couple of years ago and Ive had time to think about it more since then. Especially since a lot of the bloggers I read are passionate about it. Mostly on one side but some, including some of those closest to me, on the other. Though dont get me wrong I have firmly picked one side, Im more convinced than ever that the two sides are talking past each other.
What Id really like to see is for people from both sides to sit down and have a civil conversation about it, but thats not looking likely. The last time I saw a debate on the subject, it ended with someone ragequitting Facebook. Failing that, I decided to write a dialogue between a pro-choice character and a pro-life character. Its been done before, of course; Peter Kreefts The Unaborted Socrates was one of the formative books of my childhood. And that brings up the next problem, namely writing a dialogue honestly when you disagree with one side. Who gets to stand for the Wrong side and get zinged? How long will it take before they become a blatant strawman?
Well, in my case I have the perfect candidate. This is an issue on which I have changed my mind; therefore, my interlocutors will both be myself, on either side of the change. Im not claiming that everybody or anybody but me on either side holds the opinion I present on their behalf here. I do promise that they both honestly represent my opinion on the subject at different times in my life. I know myself well enough to know that if I were to meet myself I would ignore any topic to hand and try to figure out how the time loop Id obviously run into worked. Therefore, the dialogue takes place over the internet and neither side is aware that they are the same person.
TheHatMan is approximately me at age 19, but I havent pinned him down to an exact point in my life. Also, hes magically clued-up on things like Google which werent around in 1997. However, a content note: he is even less mindful of privilege than I am and at one point makes an inappropriate rape analogy. VeryRarelyStable is obviously me now, except that wherever TheHatMan discusses things in his own life VeryRarelyStable has conveniently forgotten them (and vice versa).
My name is Daniel Copeland. Immanuel Kant was a real... I like quirky humour, Im incurably philosophical, and I hail from the Antipodes (New Zealand rather than Australia, but still). For my living, I take notes in lectures at the University of Otago on behalf of students with disabilities.
Showing posts with label Peter Kreeft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Kreeft. Show all posts
Thursday, 12 September 2013
Sunday, 23 September 2012
Take a deep breath before commenting...
(Originally published 26 April, 2011, as a Note on my Facebook.)
I've been avoiding writing about this for years. Because this is going to make people angry. The topic for today is abortion.
As most of you know, I used to be an evangelical Christian, and most of my family still are. As most of you also know, I'm of a left-wing bent politically. This means that unless I take a weaselly middle-of-the-road not-saying-anything-really position on abortion, I am going to be fitting myself into somebody close to me's definition of "evil".
And that would be easy to do. I'm male; abortion is not something I'll ever be in a position to experience personally. I can even argue that it would be a bit presumptuous of me to take one position or the other, simply for that reason!
But that's not going to fly. I vote. I (occasionally) make submissions on bills before Parliament. I intend to live alongside women for the remainder of my life, and their welfare matters to me. I'm never personally going to experience child slavery either, but that doesn't mean I should avoid forming a strong opinion on it.
I've been avoiding writing about this for years. Because this is going to make people angry. The topic for today is abortion.
As most of you know, I used to be an evangelical Christian, and most of my family still are. As most of you also know, I'm of a left-wing bent politically. This means that unless I take a weaselly middle-of-the-road not-saying-anything-really position on abortion, I am going to be fitting myself into somebody close to me's definition of "evil".
And that would be easy to do. I'm male; abortion is not something I'll ever be in a position to experience personally. I can even argue that it would be a bit presumptuous of me to take one position or the other, simply for that reason!
But that's not going to fly. I vote. I (occasionally) make submissions on bills before Parliament. I intend to live alongside women for the remainder of my life, and their welfare matters to me. I'm never personally going to experience child slavery either, but that doesn't mean I should avoid forming a strong opinion on it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)