I still own several Discworld books with the old About the author blurb that begins Terry Pratchett was born in 1948 and is still not dead. That sentence is now only half true. Because of the International Date Line, it was Friday the 13th here when I found out he had died. This seemed appropriate.
I met him three times, if thirty seconds in a book-signing queue counts as meeting. The first time, I was fifteen, and the signing was at my high school. I remember hurrying to get to the auditorium in time for his talk, and very nearly bumping into him in the corridor a small man, egg-bald, with a neatly trimmed grey beard, and eyes that looked like he had had some bad news earlier that day. That last impression stands out in my memory because it was so unusual for me to notice anything like that when I was fifteen. (Even today, Im not fantastic at facial expressions.)
And now Im sitting here trying to pick one thing or a few things out of his immense body of work, and tell you how it impacted on me. This is difficult. Even doing it chronologically is proving to be a problem, because it goes so far back that I honestly dont remember what the first Pratchett book I read was. Im almost sure it was either Wyrd Sisters or Moving Pictures. I do remember reading Reaper Man when it was new out, and that was the one after Moving Pictures. And I can tell you that Pratchett got me out of the endless loop of Tolkien that I got stuck in for a bit there in my teenage not that theres anything wrong with being a Tolkien fan, needless to say, but its better to read more than one author. Pratchett showed me that fantasy doesnt have to be about battles and kings and the fate of the world. Ordinary peoples stories are worth reading too.
There was darkness under Pratchetts good humour. When Robin Williams died last year a lot of people pointed out that comics tend to have honed their craft battling inner demons. Williams familiar demon was sadness; Pratchetts, according to Neil Gaiman who knew him for nearly half his life, was anger. Its no coincidence that his two most complex and fully realized protagonists, Granny Weatherwax and Commander Samuel Vimes, both wrestle perpetually to control pent-up inner fountains of rage. Rage at what? For their author, rage at the unfairness of the world; rage at how stupid people can be. I dont mean the sneering Why do I have to put up with you peasants? kind of anger at stupidity I mean that Pratchett saw how officialdom and pomposity and cant and petty-mindedness get people hurt. And he could never quite shrug it off with an Oh well, lifes not fair, thats how it is. Pratchett always cared what happened to people. He stood for practicality and hard work like Kipling, and for social justice like Dickens.
But perhaps because he lived with darkness, Pratchett also learned to embrace it. He made Death a sympathetic character, not cruel, just terribly good at his job (and how those words sting just now!): calm, friendly, professional, fond of little pleasures like good food and the company of cats, but perpetually bemused by the foibles of humanity. I dont have figures on how much that one creative choice has helped people cope with the inevitable end of life. Apparently elderly readers used to write to him, hoping hed got Death right. Other fantasy franchises seem to be adopting the idea, at least partly. Much of Supernatural is blatantly pinched from Pratchett, though their Death character is slightly sterner and quicker on the uptake. Harry Potter may not have a personified Death, but Rowlings treatment of it calm, courageous acceptance has a distinctly Pratchettian feel.
I toyed with the idea of writing a short story for this post, where Pratchett himself meets Death, but thereve been a couple of good ones already that I wont try and better. Let me instead say farewell by echoing the final few entries on his Twitter:
At last, Sir Terry, we must walk together.
Terry took Deaths arm and followed him through the doors and on to the black desert under the endless night.